| List of Objectives: |
| |
1. Participants will be able to list and describe two types of elbow injuries in youth baseball players.
2. Participants will be able to list three critical components of preventing elbow and shoulder injuries in youth baseball players.
3. Participants will be able to describe the phases of pitching and identify which phase is most closely related to elbow injuries in baseball.
|
Elbow
And Shoulder Injuries In Youth Baseball Players
Introduction
Injuries
come with the long hours of practice and competition in the sport of baseball.
Research has indicated that injuries in professional and collegiate baseball
players may result from years of overuse and repetition. For example,
a recent study of collegiate males in the United States reported fifteen
percent of the athletes who had pitched in youth baseball stated that
pain, tenderness, or limited motion compromised their ability to throw.
(5)
There are more
than 19,000,000 amateur baseball players. (5) Approximately twenty five
percent of these athletes participate in pitching. The repetitive nature
of baseball pitching results in a high-risk for overuse injuries. (17)
The majority of youth baseball injuries involve the upper extremity. (7)
Due to the repetitive nature of pitching, pitchers are at the greatest
risk for sustaining a throwing injury to the arm. (6) The purpose of this
article is to discuss the epidemiology, biomechanics, and prevention of
elbow and shoulder injuries in youth baseball players.
Epidemiology of
Injuries
The following section
will examine the basic anatomy of the elbow and shoulder and common types
of elbow and shoulder injuries in baseball pitchers.
Basic Anatomy
The medial ligaments
of the elbow are called the ulnar collateral-ligament (UCL) complex. This
includes three parts: an anterior oblique bundle, a posterior bundle,
and a transverse segment. It is only at less than 20 degrees and more
than 120 degrees of flexion that the ulna and the radius in the elbow
provide stability. Between these extremes, the UCL is the primary medial
stabilizer of the elbow joint. It is the violent forces produced during
the throwing motion that exceed the strength of the UCL and produce microscopic
tears in the ligament. (10)
Secondary ossification
centers are present in the elbows of younger athletes in the distal humerus,
radial head, and the olecranon. Repetitive stress causes the growth plates
of these centers to be more vulnerable than the surrounding muscles or
tendons. (22) Ossification of these centers begins in the first year of
life but does not completely unite with the body of the humerus until
age 20. (8) The problem arises when athletes age 9-13 have the un-united
epiphyses that are subjected to the pull of the attached muscles. (1)
Types of Injuries
There are several
common types of shoulder and elbow injuries in youth pitchers. The primary
injury in the arm of a youth baseball pitcher is Little League Elbow.
Little League Elbow, identified in 1960 by Brogdon (2), is "the clinical
diagnosis in the immature athlete that results from hard, repetitive sub-threshold
throwing." This condition is caused by repetitive valgus micro trauma.
The cause is vague and usually is a result of overuse inflammation of
the proximal humerus or an actual stress fracture. Little League elbow
directly relates to the amount and intensity of throwing. (9) Other injuries
to the elbow include flexor-pronator tendonitis and posterior impingement.
(20)
Although injuries
in youth baseball players occur to the elbow, some injuries occur to the
shoulder. Commonly injured shoulder structures include the rotator cuff,
glenoid labrum, glenohumeral ligaments, and biceps anchor. Rotator cuff
injuries are the result of one of three mechanisms: primary impingement,
secondary impingement due to underlying stability, and tensile overload.
(20) Another injury to the shoulder is a lesion of the labrum. This is
a result of extreme compressive, distraction, and translational forces
during the cocking and deceleration phases of pitching. This repetitive
micro-trauma to the area can cause fraying or tearing of the anterosuperior
portion of the labrum. Most often these are referred to as a superior
labral anterior-posterior lesion or a SLAP lesion. This is accompanied
by disruption of the biceps anchor that can lead to increased anterior-inferior
translation of the humeral head when the anchor is detached. (20)
Little Leaguer's
Shoulder is also a medically recognized injury. This was described by
Dotter in 1953 (18) and is best defined as "a stress fracture of
the proximal humeral physis". This is caused because the weakest
link in the kinetic chain of the throwing shoulder is the proximal humeral
epiphysis in the adolescent population (18).
Biomechanics
The
biomechanics of throwing and pitching are critical components when examining
elbow and shoulder injuries in youth baseball players. Biomechanics are
considered to be one of the most important factors that affect throwing
performance and injury potential. (13) Due to unnatural movements, excessively
high stresses are generated at the shoulder joint during throwing. The
complex movement pattern of throwing requires flexibility, muscular strength,
coordination, synchronicity of muscular firing, and neuromuscular efficiency.
(23) This section will discuss the six phases of throwing, the kinematics
of throwing, and the relationship of biomechanics and kinematics to injury.
Phases of Pitching
Pitching is one
of the most dynamic motions in sport. This is demonstrated when the average
time from initial foot contact of the stride leg to ball release is 0.145
seconds. The ball is accelerated from 4 to 85 miles per hour during this
time. (11) The most dynamic movements of the human body are the external
and internal rotation of the shoulder during throwing. (11) Thus, it is
important to differentiate the six phases that comprise the motion of
pitching. These phases include windup, stride, arm cocking, arm acceleration,
arm deceleration, and follow-through.
During the windup
phase, the pitcher must achieve a balanced position as the knee of the
stride leg raises. The delivery of the ball to the pitcher is then initiated
from this position. (11) During the windup phase, minimal elbow movements
and kinematics are present. (21) The stride phase begins as the hands
separate and ends as the front foot contacts the mound. The elbow reaches
eighty-five degrees of flexion with foot contact. (21) The most important
part of the stride phase is the location of the front foot. The stride
foot should land directly in front of the back foot with toes slightly
inverted. However, it is when the toes are turned too far in that the
pitcher "throw's across his body" and reduces the energy contributed
by the lower body. This predisposes a pitcher to upper extremity injury.
(11) The third phase is arm cocking. This phase begins when the front
foot contacts the pitching mound and ends when the arm is in maximum external
rotation. (21) At the end of the phase, one of the pitcher's arms is cocked
and the thrower's legs, hip, and trunk have been accelerated. (11)
Arm acceleration,
the fourth phase of pitching, is short and dynamic. (21) The arm acceleration
phase starts when the humerus begins to internally rotate about the shoulder.
The release of the ball signifies the end of this phase. (11) The next
phase of pitching is arm deceleration. This phase starts with the ball
release and ends when the arm reaches its maximum internal rotation. Follow-through,
the final phase, is marked at the beginning by the arm reaching maximum
internal rotation and at the end when the pitcher attains a balanced field
position. Larger body parts, especially the trunk and legs, assist in
dissipating energy in the throwing arm. (21) The follow-through is critical
in minimizing the risk of injury in the baseball pitcher. Follow-through
is complete with extension of the stride leg, continued hip flexion, shoulder
adduction, horizontal adduction, elbow flexion, and forearm supination.
(11)
Kinematics of Pitching
The kinematics
of baseball throwing is also important in baseball biomechanics. Kinematics
includes the kinetic chain that encompasses a coordinated human movement.
It is within this human motion that both energy and momentum are transferred
through body segments to achieve maximum magnitude in the final segment.
(13) During pitching, the shoulder exceeds 7,000 degrees per second for
adult pitchers. This has been referred to as the fastest human movement.
(23) The concept of a kinetic chain is developed from the idea that this
energy is being created with large segments and muscles, and is then transferred
through the legs and trunk, out to the throwing arm, wrist, and then eventually
the ball. (23) For example, the kinetic chain for throwing consists of
the legs, hip, trunk, upper arm, forearm, hand, and the baseball. (13)
This kinetic chain for throwing includes the mentioned sequence of motions:
stride, pelvis rotation, upper torso rotation, elbow extension, shoulder
internal rotation, and wrist flexion. (13)
The potential
velocity at the distal end where the object is released is greater if
more body segments contribute to the total overall force. Less energy
is required if the kinetic chain is executed properly. Also, the performance
of the throw, either the velocity or distance, should ultimately be increased.
(23) Seven segments have been identified which incorporate movements during
the overhand throwing motion. These segments include the lower extremity,
pelvis, spine, shoulder girdle, upper arm, forearm, and the hand. (23)
Relationship of
Biomechanics and Kinematics to Pitching
The information
previously presented provides a background into why biomechanics and kinematics
are important in examining youth pitching injuries in baseball players.
A related biomechanical issue includes the relationship of biomechanics
and kinematics to upper extremity injury. Based on the six phases of throwing,
most overuse throwing injuries at the elbow and shoulders are believed
to occur during the arm cocking and arm deceleration phase. It is during
the arm deceleration phase that large loads are produced to decelerate
the moving arm and prevent elbow and shoulder distraction. (13)
For elbow injuries,
the shoulder is in extreme external rotation near the end of arm cocking
and the elbow is in flexion. This produces a large amount of stress on
the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the medial elbow. (13) Valgus stress
applied to the forearm can lead to medial elbow injury including muscle
tears, avulsion fractures, medial collateral ligament spurs, and possibly
ulnar nerve damage. (13) Also, the lateral elbow is susceptible to injury
at the end of the arm-cocking phase. Compressive forces are created between
the radial head and the humerus that contributes about one-third of the
torque to the elbow (Fleisig, Dillman, and Escamilla's study (13). The
compression that results may eventually lead to avascular necrosis, osteochondritis
dissecans or osteochondral chip fractures. (13) A significant varus torque
is placed on the posterior elbow during the arm acceleration phase that
creates an increased chance of injury. In this case, impingement is combined
with extreme elbow extension to produce an increased susceptibility to
injuries. These possible injuries include osteophytes at the posteromedial
olecranon tip, chondromalacia or the formation of loose bodies. (13)
Biomechanics
also play a major role in shoulder injuries. Most throwing injuries to
the shoulder include the rotator cuff. These injuries are the result of
the rotator cuff muscles attempting to resist distraction, horizontal
adduction, and internal rotation of the shoulder during arm deceleration.
Humeral translation can cause entrapment of the labrum, which may result
in labral tearing. Prevention of humeral translation is difficult due
to the large rotations, forces, and torques produced in the shoulder during
throwing. Specifically, during the arm deceleration phase, an inferior
force and adduction torque are produced. This may lead to superior translation
of the humerus and eventually tendonitis of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus,
and bicipital tendonitis. (13)
The kinematics
of baseball pitching is important when examining the type of pitch utilized.
Several studies conducted by Fleisig and Escamilla (23) were conducted
to compare four commonly thrown pitches including the fastball, change-up,
curveball, and the slider. Conclusions included that higher stress loads
are produced in the fastball, curveball, and slider pitches than in the
change-up. (23) However, the curveball was found to produce the greatest
elbow medial force and elbow varus torque. (23)
Prevention
The prevention
of elbow and shoulder injuries is important when examining youth baseball
players. Approximately twenty-five percent of amateur baseball players
participate in pitching. (17) In a recent study of collegiate males in
the United States, fifteen percent of the players who had pitched in youth
baseball reported pain, tenderness, or limited motion, which compromised
their ability to throw. (6) This demonstrates the need for early prevention
of elbow and shoulder injuries. This section will provide information
pertaining to the trends and issues in the prevention of elbow and shoulder
injuries in youth baseball players.
Trends in Prevention
Several landmark
research studies help explain the beginning ideas behind preventing elbow
and shoulder injuries in youth baseball players. The Houston Study in
1976 attempted to define the acute and chronic effects of Little League
participants. (14)
Five hundred and ninety-five pitchers were questioned concerning age,
number of years pitched, symptoms of elbow and shoulder injuries, and
any known injuries. Also, each pitcher was x-rayed and examined by a physician.
This particular study attempted to correlate the number of years pitched
with injury. (14) The Eugene Study, also in 1976, used the same evaluation
form and examined 120 pitchers. (15) Neither study found statistically
significant correlations relating to pitching experiences, presence of
symptoms, or x-ray findings and elbow and shoulder injuries. Thus, the
conclusion from the beginning research studies was that the problem of
abuse to the pitching arm remains on the practice field rather than during
competition. (15)
The USA Baseball
Medical and Safety Committee in collaboration with the American Sports
Medicine Institute conducted the next group of significant studies concerning
elbow and shoulder injuries. The purpose of these studies was to investigate
the relationship between arm injuries and pain and factors believed to
be related to injury. (12) These factors include types of pitches, number
of pitches, and the quality of the mechanics. The 1996 study included
surveying nationally recognized baseball coaches and physicians. The conclusions
were that coaches at all levels of baseball should monitor the number
of pitches thrown and not the number of innings pitched. A second recommendation
was that pitchers should not use breaking pitches until their bones are
completely finished growing. (3)
This same study
in 1997-1998 study included monitoring 300 youth baseball pitchers in
the Birmingham, Alabama area. (16) Almost half of these youth baseball
pitchers, ages 8-12, reported elbow or shoulder pain at least once during
the study. The increase in the number of pitches thrown per game and the
number of pitches thrown per season resulted in an increase in the risk
of elbow and shoulder pain. Thus, the recommendations based on this study
included limiting a youth baseball pitcher to 75 pitches per game for
this age group. (16) The 1999 study again monitored 500 youth baseball
pitchers throughout the state of Alabama. (16) This study again showed
that half of all youth pitchers have shoulder or elbow pain during the
season and the risk of pain increases with the number of pitches thrown.
Recommendations included limiting the number of pitches to 75 per game
and 600 pitches per season. The study also demonstrated that youth pitchers
who use curveballs and sliders increase their risk of pain. (16) The 2000
and 2001 studies consisted of conducting end of the year interviews of
the 1999 subjects. These data will be used in the future to identify trends
and to relate career cumulative pitching characteristics with serious
elbow and shoulder injuries.
Issues in Prevention
Several guiding
principles are related to preventing elbow and shoulder injuries in youth
baseball pitchers. These include the idea that prevention is participatory,
dependent upon rules and regulations, and multi-dimensional. First, prevention
is participatory. This includes the idea that preventing injuries needs
to include the league personnel, parents, coaches, and any other pertinent
members. For example, the parents can identify early recognition of injuries.
Simultaneously, coaches are responsible for knowing the fundamentals of
baseball and teaching the proper mechanics of throwing and pitching. Secondly,
prevention is dependent upon the Little League rules and regulations.
For example, Little League rules state that 9-12 year olds can pitch up
to six innings per week and 13-14 year olds are allowed to pitch up to
9 innings per week. (5) Also of interest, is the age cut off for teams.
If a child's skeletal maturation is delayed and participation is based
upon an age-determined team, then the child may pitch beyond their physical
tolerance and develop secondary problems. (19)
Finally, prevention
is multi-dimensional. The term "overuse" is often used and is
an oversimplification. It implies that the solution to youth pitching
injuries is for players to pitch and throw less. However, prevention must
also include several other dimensions. These prevention strategies include
monitoring the number of pitches or throws, the frequency of play, the
velocity or speed, throwing mechanics, the player's age, and the implementation
of an interval throwing program. (22)
The interval-throwing
program is a recently developed distance-based throwing program based
on distance and speed. The program is progressive as it loads the upper
extremity either by increasing the intensity (speed or distance), duration
(sets or repetitions), or both. Two components make up the program. The
short component simulates the physical demands of the player that occur
in a game situation. The long component is designed to provide low-intensity,
long duration stimulation to throwers to increase arm strength. Criteria
necessary to implement the interval-throwing program include the program
being functional, personal, safe, and practical. (5)
Summary
Overall, several
important areas need to be examined to understand elbow and shoulder injuries
in youth baseball players. These areas include but are not limited to
epidemiology, biomechanics, and prevention of elbow and shoulder injuries
in youth baseball pitchers. First, most injuries occur to the elbow, with
Little League Elbow being the most common injury. The anatomy of the elbow
allows for instability that is a predisposing factor to injury, however
the shoulder can also be injured with pitching and throwing in youth baseball
players. Secondly, the ability to pitch correctly requires proper biomechanics.
Improper mechanics may lead to a decrease in performance or an increase
in the risk of injury. (21) Information concerning throwing injuries and
the six phases of throwing can help teach techniques to improve treatment
and prevention of throwing injuries. (13)
Finally, prevention
is another aspect of elbow and shoulder injuries. Prevention is multi-dimensional
and includes all personnel involved. Additionally, the major concern is
the number of pitches not the number of innings pitched per youth baseball
player.
The information above indicates that researching elbow and shoulder injuries
in youth baseball players requires a comprehensive approach. Many components,
including epidemiology, biomechanics and prevention must be examined to
completely understand the significance and severity of injuries to a youth
baseball pitcher's arm.
References
Adams, J.E. (1964). Injury to the throwing arm: A study of traumatic changes
in the elbow joints of the boy baseball players. California Medicine,
102(2), 127-132.
Andrews, J. R., Fleisig,
G. S., & Whiteside, J. A. (2000) Little leaguer's elbow: Evaluation,
treatment, and prevention. Sports Medicine Update, 14(3), 11-15.
Andrews, J. R. &
Fleisig, G. S. 1996, How many pitchers should I allow my child to throw?
USA Baseball News.
Altchek, D.W. &
Dines, D.M. (1995). Shoulder injuries in the throwing athletes. Journal
of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 3(3), 159-165.
Axe, M. J. (2001).
Recommendations for protecting youth baseball pitchers. Sports Medicine
and Arthroscopy Review, 9, 147-153.
Axe, M. J., Wickham,
R., & Snyder-Mackler, L. (2001). Data-based interval throwing programs
for Little League, high school, college, and professional baseball players.
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, 9, 24-34.
Axe, M. J., Snyder-Mackler,
L., Konin, J. G., & Strube, M. J. (1996). Development of a distance-based
interval throwing program for little league-aged athletes. The American
Journal of Sports Medicine, 24(5), 594-602.
Barnett, L. S. (1985).
Little league shoulder syndrome: Proximal humeral epiphyseolysis in adolescent
baseball pitchers. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 7-A (3),
495-496.
Carson, W. G., &
Gasser, S. (1998). Little Leaguer's shoulder: A report of 23 cases. The
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(4), 575-580.
Conway, J.E., Jobe,
F.W., Glousman, R.E., & Pink, M. (1992). Medial instability of the
Elbow in throwing athletes. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,
74-A(1), 67-83.
Dillman, C.J., Fleisig,
G.S., & Andrews, J.R. (1993). Biomechanics of pitching with emphasis
upon shoulder kinematics. Journal of Sport Physical Therapy, 18(2),
402-408.
Fleisig, G. &
Andrews, J. (2002, January 4-5). Effect of pitch type, pitch count and
Pitching mechanics on risk of arm pain and injury. Oral presentation at
the annual USA Baseball Medical and Safety Committee Meeting.
Fleisig, G. S., Barrentine,
S.W., Escamilla, R.F., & Andrews, J.R. (1996). Biomechanics of overhand
throwing with implications for injuries. Sports Medicine, 21(6),421-437.
Gugenheim, J. J.,
Stanley, R. F., Woods, G. W., & Tullos, H. S. (1976). Little League
Study: the Houston study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine,
4(5), 189-200.
Larson, R. L., Singer,
K. M., Bergstrom, R., & Thomas, S. (1976). Little league survey: the
Eugene study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 4(5), 201-209.
Lyman, S. L., Fleisig,
G. S., Waterbor, J. W., Funkhouser, E. M., Pulley, L., Andrews, J. R.,
et al. (2001). Longitudinal study of elbow and shoulder pain in youth
Baseball pitchers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,
1803-1810.
Lyman, S. L., Fleisig,
G. S., Andrews, J. R., & Osinski, E. D. (1998). Youth pitching injuries:
First-ever examination sheds light on arm injuries in youth baseball.
Sports Medicine Update, 13(2), 4-9.
Meister, K. (2000).
Injuries to the shoulder in the throwing athlete: Part One: Biomechanics/Pathophysiology/Classification
of Injury. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine, 28(2), 265-275.
Pappas, A. M. (1982).
Elbow problems associated with baseball during childhood and adolescence.
Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 164, 30-41.
Rizio, L. & Uribe,
J.W. (2001). Overuse injuries of the upper extremity in baseball. Clinics
in Sports Medicine, 20(3), 453-468.
Werner, S. L., Fleisig,
G.S., Dillman, C.J., & Andrews, J.R. (1993). Biomechanics of the elbow
during baseball pitching. Journal of Sport Physical Therapy, 17(6),
274-278.
Whiteside, J. A.,
Andrews, J. R., & Fleisig, G. S. (1999). Elbow injuries in young baseball
players. The Physician and Sports Medicine, 27(6), 87-102.
Wilk, K.E, Meister,
K., Fleisig, G., & Andrews, J.R. (2000). Biomechanics of the overhead
throwing motion. Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, 8, 124-134.
Outline of Content:
I Introduction
-this article
discusses elbow and shoulder injuries in youth baseball players
-the epidemiology
of injuries, biomechanics, and the prevention of injuries are all discussed
II. Epidemiology
of Injuries
a. Basic anatomy
b. Types of injuries
III.Biomechanics
a. Phases of
pitching
b. Kinematics
of pitching
c. Relationship
of biomechanics and kinematics to pitching
IV. Prevention of Injuries
a. Trends in
prevention
b. Issues in
prevention
V. Summary
a. Specific areas
needed to be examined to understand elbow and shoulder injuries
b. Comprehensive
approach to understanding and preventing elbow and shoulder injuries in
youth baseball players
Number of contact
hours: 1 hour
Description: Injuries
come with the long hours of practice and competition in the sport of baseball.
This article examines the epidemiology, biomechanics, and prevention of
elbow and shoulder injuries in youth baseball pitchers.
List of Objectives:
- Participants will
be able to list and describe two types of elbow injuries in youth baseball
players.
- Participants will
be able to list three critical components of preventing
elbow and shoulder injuries in youth baseball players.
- Participants will
be able to describe the phases of pitching and identify
which phase is most closely related to elbow injuries in baseball.

1. The term for the "clinical diagnosis in the immature athlete that
results from hard, repetitive sub-threshold throwing."
a. Little League
Shoulder
b. Rotator cuff
tendonitis
c. Little League
Elbow
d. SLAP lesion
2. During which of
the following phases of pitching ends when the pitching arm reaches its
maximum internal rotation?
a. Arm acceleration
b. Wind up
c. Arm cocking
d. Arm deceleration
3. All of the following
are identified segments that incorporate movements during the overhand
throwing motion, except:
a. Upper arm
b. Spine
c. Pelvis
d. Abdomen
4. Most overuse injuries
at the elbow and shoulder occur during the:
a. Stride and
arm cocking phase
b. Arm cocking
and arm deceleration phase
c. Arm acceleration
and arm deceleration phase
d. Arm deceleration
and follow through phase
5. The interval-throwing
program is based on what two components:
a. Distance and
speed
b. Time and speed
c. Distance and
time
d. None of the
above
6. Several studies
conducted by Fleisig and Escamilla identified four commonly thrown pitches.
Which of the following was found to produce the greatest elbow medial
force and elbow varus torque.
a. Fastball
b. Curveball
c. Change-up
d. Slider
7. It is only at less
than 120 degrees of flexion that the ulna and the radius in the elbow
provide stability.
a. True
b. False
8. All of the following
are mechanisms of rotator cuff injuries except:
a. Distraction
b. Primary impingement
c. Tensile overload
d. Secondary
impingement
9. The injury defined
as "a stress fracture of the proximal humerus physis" is termed:
a. Little League
Shoulder
b. Lesion of
the labrum
c. Rotator cuff
tendonitis
d. Little League
Elbow
10. In a recent study
of United States collegiate males, 25% of the players who had pitched
in youth baseball reported pain, tenderness, or limited motion, which
compromised their ability to throw.
a. True
b. False
11. Which of the following
principles are critical when preventing elbow and shoulder injuries in
youth baseball players:
a. Prevention
is participatory
b. Prevention
is dependent upon rules and regulations
c. Prevention
is multi-dimensional
d. All of the
above
12. Which of the following
injuries is a result of extreme compressive, distraction, and translational
forces during the cocking and deceleration phases of pitching:
a. Lesion of
the labrum
b. Rotator cuff
tendonitis
c. Little League
Elbow
d. None of the
above
13. What are the most
dynamic movements of the human body:
a. External rotation
and horizontal flexion of the shoulder
b. Internal rotation
and external rotation of the shoulder
c. Horizontal
abduction and horizontal adduction of the shoulder
d. None of the
above
14. All of the following
are critical to implement in an interval-throwing program except:
a. Program is
functional
b. Program is
personal
c. Program is
safe
d. Program is
inexpensive
15. What is the average
time from initial foot contact of the stride leg to ball release in the
pitching motion:
a. 0.145 seconds
b. 0.768 seconds
c. 0.415 seconds
d. None of the
above
Record
answers below. (Or you
can click here for the answer sheet on separate page)
CEU Quiz IX Elbow and Shoulder Injuries In Youth Baseball Players
The National Athletic
Trainer's Association Board of Certification accepts this continuing education
for 1.0 hours from MEDCO SUPPLY COMPANY (Provider # P2504) provided this
quiz is completed as designed. A passing score is 70% for CEU credit.
A certificate of completion will be forwarded for all completed quizzes
with a passing grade. It is the individual's responsibility to properly
report this and all CEU information to the NATABOC at the end of each
CEU cycle. Participation is confidential.
Clearly circle
ONE answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Certification Number
_______________________________
Name _______________________________
Address _______________________________
City ________________
State ___________ Zip _________
Please Rate each item
on the scale of 1 to 5. (5 is the highest)
- Content pertinent
to Athletic Training?
1
2 3 4
5
- Content presented
at appropriate level?
1
2 3 4
5
- Organization of
materials?
1
2 3 4
5
- Quiz emphasis on
pertinent material?
1
2 3 4
5
Do you currently receive
a MEDCO Catalog? Yes / No
Back
to Medco Sports | Back
to Free CEUs
|